Buttons for other pages

Corporate Governance in Family Controlled Businesses

The objective of achieving greater accountability for performance by managers of corporations extends beyond the universe of public companies to the world of family controlled businesses and other family controlled enterprises such as family foundations, family offices and family limited partnerships.The universe of private companies (the vast preponderance of which are controlled by family groups) exceeds the universe of public companies until the threshold of revenues greater than $500,000,000 is reached. In addition, many of the Fortune 500 such as Ford are controlled by their founding families through control of the voting power to elect the boards of directors. By virtue of being family controlled these enterprises as well as the foundations, offices and investment vehicles controlled by families have long maintained what the creator of the Corporate Governance site calls "permanent shareholders."While it is unlikely that family controlled enterprises will move beyond looking like "political oligarchies" there are numerous instances where these enterprises establish effective corporate governance, although not always in the form of a truly supervisory board of directors. Given the clout that family controlled enterprises wield in both the for profit and the not for profit worlds, I believe some attention ought to be paid to enhancing effective governance of this sector of the economy. Some of the developments in the public company world have direct applicability. Many do not. Some developments in the world of family business might enlighten many advocates of corporate governance in public companies. The implications of this topic for economies on Pacific Rim, in Latin America and in Europe where the preponderance of capital is still controlled by family groups are profound. I believe it is unlikely the issues will be discussed outside of the U.S., however, unless the topic is broached here. Across the globe privately controlled and family controlled enterprises share many problems that are susceptible to cross border solutions. If there is any interest in this subject on this site, I would be pleased to facilitate a discussion. Richard Narva
Principal Consultant
Genus Resources, Inc.
genusr@aol.com

Return to Corporate Governance Commentary