![]() |
|||
|
A decade of record investment returns and low inflation has resulted in dramatically reduced employer contribution rates in most retirement systems, including PERS?but I have not seen or heard of comparable improvements in the retirement benefits of active or retired members of California public retirement systems during that period?I'm particularly dissatisfied with the PERS program. In my opinion, the PERS Board's micro management of the investment program and its emphasis on corporate governance issues diverted Board, staff, public and even legislative attention, from the basic needs of the PERS membership. (For a copy of the article, call 916-455-7322 or 916-456-5282) Adams thinks it is "appalling" that PERS only provides retirement
benefits to 20-30% of CalPERS members and believes that if the
Board had paid attention to "core values," members "would have
done much better." While I believe the CalPERS program on corporate governance has improved the accountability of corporations to their shareholders and has contributed to increasing shareholder wealth, I too question how accountable the CalPERS Board has been to its own members. According to the Sacramento Bee, the Board has lowered the State's contribution rate 8 times in the last 11 years. However, their efforts to improve benefits for CalPERS members do not appear to have been nearly so great. Perhaps the statements of Mr. Adams will serve as a wake-up call to the members of retirement systems everywhere to ensure their systems are administered on their behalf. TIAA-CREF Expands Its Corporate Governance Program: B.A. "Dolph" Bridgewater joins as a senior consultant, and Kenneth
Bertsch as a new full-time director for corporate governance yielding
six professionals in TIAA-CREF's corporate governance program. Back to the top Governance highlights the 45 provisions of the new Combined Code and a new guide put out by the ICSA. "It is likely to be at least a year before a broad consensus emerges between companies, institutional investors and other professional groups and regulators as to what actually constitutes best practice for Combined Code Statements." The January issue also includes an interview with Bob Monks who talks about the recent merger of LENS and HLAM. Monks apparently moved to London last summer and now spends about 2/3 of his time in the UK and 1/3 in the US. His motivation? "To combine the immense creativity liberated through a corporate system with a set of values and accountability to make the corporate power congenial to a free society." ISS reports that UK Trade and Industry Secretary, Stephen Byers,
is speaking out against "fat cat" pay packages for top executives.
He is said to be examining proposals that would either require
annual shareholder approval of executive remuneration or require
all directors to be elected annually. The newly established Combined
Code asks that directors stand every 3 years. Byers may seek to
have the changes incorporated into the London Stock Exchange listing
rules. Median pay levels for mutual fund directors were up 12% to an estimated annual pay of $103,000 for large companies. That may be too much for four meetings a year, according to a study by InvestmentNews. Some directors "may be more beholden to the fund managers who appoint them to new funds than to the shareholders they represent," InvestmentNews reports. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt opens hearings this week aimed at improving the current system of fund governance. see also statement from Investment Company Institute President Matthew P. Fink regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission roundtable on the role of independent investment company directors. Direct Stock Market to Provide Free Live Webcast Coverage of Galef II Symposium on Corporate Governance beginning at 8 a.m. (PST), Feb. 24th. New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association board expenses
questioned. Rep. Max Coll, D-Santa Fe, has introduced a bill that
would restrict the value of gifts, including trips, that the 12
board members, or employees, could accept from vendors to $50,
or an annual total of $150. The bill would also prohibit acceptance
of such gifts given through a third party. Board meeting agendas
in 1998 and 1999 show requests for board member travel to seminars
in: Hong Kong; Capetown; San Francisco; San Diego; and Phoenix.
All of the trips were to be paid for by nonprofit institutions
that conduct investment education seminars. (Albuquerque Journal, 2/19) Back to the top Mary O'Sullivan sees the biggest risk now faced by the German system
of corporate governance is that German labor and finance will
insist on pursuing their own independent strategies to extract
returns from industrial enterprises and the system will dissipate
into a "stakeholder economy" in which different interest groups
fight for their claims to corporate returns without any concern
for whether these returns are sustainable. (Corporate Governance in Germany, Levy Institute Public Policy
Brief No. 49.) Korn/Ferry International has issued their 25th Annual Board of Director's Study. Their
5 year forecast finds performance evaluations of the CEO will
become common with individual director evaluations increasing
more slowly. Written corporate governance policies are becoming
more common, as are meetings of independent directors without
the CEO present. Few se a split chair/CEO coming but independent
outside directors continue to gain over insiders. Pension benefit
plans for directors continue to be phased out and stock ownership
continues to grow. BusinessWeek's Jennifer Reingold applauds moves by the FASB to
count repriced options as an expense and by the SEC to require
General DataComm to include a proposal by SWIB in its proxy statement
banning repricing without prior shareholder approval. At the same
time her commentary, "Slimmer Rewards for a Job Poorly Done,"
says the New York Stock Exchange should "go back to the drawing
board" on any option plan that would dilute the owner's stake
without allowing them to vote. She reports on one firm that worked
on 100 repricings as the 12/15/98 deadline set by the FASB approached.
Shareholders are being taken seriously on this issue. Time to
keep the pressure on. (2/15/99, BusinessWeek) CalPERS uploaded a new site devoted exclusively to corporate governance. CalPERS Shareowner Forum, can be found at http://www.calpers-governance.org. Included is a searchable library of over 14,000 abstracts of corporate governance studies, essays, reports and papers on global issues, trends and views on corporate governance. We haven't seen anything this good since LENS slimmed down their site. CalPERS is communcating its proxy intentions through this internet safe harbor. Let's hope others follow their lead. Back to the top An editorial and a feature article in The Economist , January 16, 1999, point to the OECD's convention which takes
effect next month making bribery of foreign officials a crime.
A lot of grey areas will remain but The Economist holds hope in
further evidence that "freer countries will be cleaner countries...corruption
is but one form of oppression." The World Bank and the IMF are
increasingly linking aid to "good governance." Stanley Dubiel
highlights their six-pronged approach in the December ISSueAlert. The emphasis is on monitoring by banks, accounting and disclosure
improvements, enforcement, improving the framework, facilitating
oversight by equity investors and data collection. Oklahoma Supreme Court uphold the right of Fleming Cos. investors to pursue a binding bylaw proposal. Patrick McGurn of ISS is quoted as saying, "we're going to see binding bylaw resolutions become the weapon of first choice for institutional activists." (WSJ, 1/28/99) The Proxy Monitor announced the first Web-based delivery service for proxy research and Year 2000 portfolio reporting. They also announced support of SWIB's shareholder proposal meeting to prohibit option repricing without shareholder at General DataComm Industries Inc. (GDC-NYSE) through a bylaws provision. SWIB owns a little less than 10% of the company's common stock. Back to the top
Contact: All material on the Corporate Governance site is copyright ©1995-1999 by Corporate Governance and James McRitchie except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved. |
||