Tag Archives | James McRitchie

SRI Movement: Don’t Go Alone

SRI MovementBe Part of the SRI Movement

A lack of affordable SRI investing solutions may incentivize some savvy investors to do their own research and purchase their own portfolio of individual stocks, but this is almost always a mistake. There is power in the SRI Movement.

If you’re joining the SRI movement, it’s likely because you have a vision for our world and the economy that’s bigger than your own portfolio. To leverage the full scope of impact, you should identify ways that you can coordinate your efforts with others whose values overlap with your own. The easiest way to do this is by purchasing a SRI fund, but there are other ways to maximize your impact. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Committee to Rescue Reed’s: Proxy Vote

Committee to Rescue Reet's - Room for More Shareholders

Committee to Rescue Reed’s Declares Victory

The Committee to Rescue Reed’s declares victory and states how members intend to vote their proxies. With the annual meeting now set for November 29, I will post a more detailed analysis of the proxy by tomorrow. I have already received a number of inquiries from those asking how I will vote. Advice to me? Use the comment box below.

The Committee to Rescue Reed’s Announces That It Has Completed Its Near-Term Objectives at Reed’s and Is Therefore Withdrawing Its Board Nominees and Proxy Contest

Gratified That its Involvement Led to a Reconstituted Board with Four New Independent Directors

Rescue Reed’s Members State Their Intention to Vote Against Chairman & CEO Chris Reed for Failing to Work in Good Faith with the Committee to Appoint Shareholder Nominees to the Board

Rescue Members Intend to Remain Vigilant in Monitoring the Performance of the Company, its CEO and New Directors Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Committee to Rescue Reeds files 13D

Schedule 13D Filed by the Committee to Rescue Reed's

Schedule 13D Filed by the Committee to Rescue Reed’s

On October 11, 2016, the Committee to Rescue Reeds issued a statement concerning the breakdown in its recent good-faith efforts to work with the Issuer’s Chairman of the Board and CEO, Chris Reed, to reach a mutually agreeable director slate and avoid a proxy contest at the 2016 Annual Meeting. In its statement, the Committee noted that it remains hopeful that an expanded, mutually agreeable slate of nominees will ultimately be agreed upon by the parties, but that as of October 6, 2016, the independently mediated process the Committee and Mr. Reed had previously agreed to was obstructed by Mr. Reed’s failure to provide the names and contact information of the Board’s recommended nominees. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Rescue Reed’s Discussions Stall

Committee to Rescue Reet's - Room for More Shareholders

Committee to Rescue Reed’s – Room for More Shareholders

Severely Disappointed that CEO Chris Reed Has Stalled the Process Aimed at Reaching a Mutually Agreeable Slate of Board Candidates

The Committee Has Tried to Work Constructively and in Good-Faith with Mr. Reed for Many Weeks to Reach a Compromise Board and Avoid a Proxy Contest, but to No Avail

The Committee Is Left with No Choice But to Proceed with Next Steps for Seeking the Election of its Five Highly Qualified Director Candidates at Reed’s 2016 Annual Meeting

Remains Open to Working with Mr. Reed to Arrive at a Unified Director Slate as Proxy Deadlines Loom Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

HRB H&R Block: How I Voted – Proxy Score 57

HRB Never Settle

HRB Never Settle For Fake Proxy Access

H & R Block Inc (NYSE:HRB, $HRB) provides tax preparation and banking services and is one of the stocks in my portfolio. Their next annual meeting is September 8, 2016. ProxyDemocracy.org had collected the votes of one fund when I checked and voted but Proxy Insight had many more. I voted in favor of my suggested proxy access amendments to current bylaws and with the Board’s recommendations 64% of the time. View Proxy Statement. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Stock Buybacks: Four Reasons

Stock Buybacks

Stock Buybacks

Stock Buybacks: Directors Identify Four Reasons Stock Buyback Programs

Stock buybacks have reached their highest level since the financial crisis, with S&P 500 companies repurchasing $166.3 billion of shares in first quarter of 2016. The Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute (IRRCi) and Tapestry Networks have scheduled a webinar for Tuesday, September 13, 2016, at 1 PM ET to review the findings and respond to questions. Register at no charge here.  Download the research here.

Stock Buybacks: What Directors Say

As large American public corporations repurchase company shares at historic rates, corporate directors cite four key reasons for buybacks: to return capital to shareholders; invest in the company’s shares; offset dilution from using equity as currency; and/or alter the company’s capital structure. The directors generally disagree with widespread criticism of corporate stock buybacks, and say that companies need to better disclose the reasons for undertaking buybacks.

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

The Handbook of Board Governance: Part 4

The Handbook of Board Governance

The Handbook of Board Governance in Times Square

I continue my review of The Handbook of Board Governance: A Comprehensive Guide for Public, Private, and Not-for-Profit Board Member. With the current post, I provide comments on Part 4 of the book, The Rise of Shareholder Accountability. As a shareholder advocate, this is my favorite part of The Handbook of Board Governance. See prior introductory comments and those on Part 1Part 2 and Part 3. I suspect The Handbook of Board Governance will soon be the most popular collection of articles of current interest in the field of corporate governance.”

The Handbook of Board Governance: The Happy Myth, Sad Reality

Robert A.G. Monks warns, capitalism without owners will fail. The chapter is a condensed and updated version of Citizens DisUnited: Passive Investors, Drone CEOs, and the Corporate Capture of the American Dream, which I reviewed here. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

The Handbook of Board Governance

The Handbook of Board Governance

When I agreed to contribute a chapter to Richard Leblanc’s book, I knew he was an excellent speaker, blogger and teacher. I also suspected he was a good promoter. How else could he attract over 23,000 members to his Linkedin group, Boards & Advisors? But, I never dreamed I’d see The Handbook of Board Governance: A Comprehensive Guide for Public, Private, and Not-for-Profit Board Members make the lights of New York’s Times Square across from the Hard Rock Cafe. Now I’m half expecting to see Leblanc on the late night TV circuit, like a candidate for public office reaching out to voters.
Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Deal Professor: Haranguing

Haranguing

Haranguing

Haranguing – A speech addressed to a large public assembly; a popular oration; a loud address to a multitude; in a bad sense, a noisy or pompous speech; declamation; ranting. A speech before a multitude or on the hustings.

Once again, the Deal Professor blasts gadflies John Chevedden, James McRitchie and William Steiner – this time for haranguing directors at annual meetings. A couple of years ago, Deal Professor Steven Davidoff Solomon equated our activities with terrorism (Deal Professor Equates Filing Proxy Proposals with Terrorism). Last week he wrote that we “make a habit of haranguing directors at corporate meetings.” (Online Shareholder Meetings Lower Costs, but Also Interaction, NYTimes, 5/31/2016).

In an otherwise fairly balanced article on the positives and negatives of online shareholder meetings, Solomon writes, Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

iRobot Adopts Proxy Access: McRitchie Withdraws – Contest Looms

iRobot Adopts Proxy AccessiRobot adopts proxy access bylaws filed with SEC Form 8-K on March 9, 2016 (See Section 11). James McRitchie, publisher of Corporate Governance (CorpGov.net) conditioned withdrawal of his proposal for proxy access at iRobot (IRBT) on the amended bylaws, including several key elements meeting best practices as outlined by the Council of Institutional Investors.  Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

McRitchie Interview by Rafat: Whole Foods

McRitchie Interview by Rafat

McRitchie Interview by Rafat after Whole Foods Annual Meeting

McRitchie Interview by Rafat

McRitchie interview by Rafat. At last week’s meeting of Whole Foods Market shareholders, I met with Matthew (Mateo) Rafat, whom I’d known of because of his series of posts at Seeking Alpha. He was the only one reporting what happened at shareholder meetings. This was the first time we had met in-person.

Matthew Rafat and John Mackey at Whole Foods Meeting

Matthew Rafat & John Mackey

After the Whole Foods meeting, where my proxy access proposal received a 40% vote, Matthew and I grabbed a bite to eat. He then recorded the interview posted below. I’ve add some commentary below to make our discussion, especially my answers, a little more comprehensible.

We discussed issues of interest to many shareholders such as proxy access and how it differs from a proxy contest, why diversity is important, why shareholders submit precatory proposals rather than binding resolutions and a little about the rulemaking process. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

CSP Inc.: Proxy Score 87

CSPCSP Inc. (CSPI), together with its subsidiaries, develops and markets IT integration solutions and cluster computer systems to commercial and defense customers in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. CSP Inc. is one of the stocks in my portfolio. Their annual meeting is on February 9, 2016. ProxyDemocracy.org didn’t have a listing for CSP I presume it is because the company is too small.  I voted for the directors, pay, auditor and for proxy access, therefore with the Board’s recommendations 87% of the time. View Proxy Statement. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Vanguard’s Political Disclosure Vote: Wrong!

Vanguard's Political Disclosure Vote is Wrong (2nd from bottom on graph)

Vanguard’s Political Disclosure Vote is Wrong (2nd from bottom on graph)

VanguardLet’s change Vanguard’s political disclosure vote. Our nation’s largest mutual fund voted against all resolutions submitted by shareholders asking for companies to disclose their political spending. Shouldn’t we have the right to know what candidates our investments are supporting?

Vanguard’s Political Disclosure Vote Needs Changed

Join more than 59,000 American’s who have already petitioned Vanguard to change their proxy voting behavior. Support shareholder resolutions that seek disclosure of political spending at companies where Vanguard owns a shares. If Vanguard votes with us, instead of against us, it won’t be long before other large funds like BlackRock start doing the same. Within a few years, we could actually begin to know what companies are funneling how much money to which candidates. Vanguard’s political disclosure vote can be changed – with your help. Sign the petition by U.S. PIRG to change Vanguard’s political disclosure vote. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Who Withdraws Shareholder Proposals?

Withdraws Shareholder Proposals

Withdraws Shareholder Proposals

Who Withdraws Shareholder Proposals and Does It Matter? An Analysis of Sponsor Identity and Pay Practices is the title of an import study in the November 2015 issue of Corporate Governance: An International Review. Examination of this topic is long overdue. Companies constantly take full credit for corporate governance reforms, such as the addition of proxy access bylaws, when they are doing so only to avoid a vote on a more robust shareholder proposal. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes