Employee Ownership

Employee Ownership 2022 Proposals

Employee ownership is my next focus. Support for proposals in 2020 and 2021 to encourage companies to add workers to the board has been weak. It is time to reassess. My conversations with CalPERS were especially interesting. Directors I interviewed who were elected by the members favored our proposals. Staff, those charged with voting shares owned by CalPERS, did not. Those stark differences would be interesting to explore in-depth. If we cannot win the support of public pensions like CalPERS, CalSTRS, and the NYC Comptroller, we need to rethink our approach.

In reviewing those results in conjunction with the academic literature (such as Lifting Labor’s Voice), I see we have been trying to follow a European model without the basic infrastructure, such as supervisory boards, half elected by workers. America has a weak union movement (although that may be changing). We have no labor party. Even if companies were convinced to include workers in the initial candidate pool for directors, there is no ready mechanism for workers to choose their representatives. Most companies have discouraged worker to worker channels of communication, preferring management-sponsored surveys and town hall meetings.

Employee Ownership: Focus of 2022 Proposals

Whereas co-determination models have been advocated almost exclusively by Democrats, employee ownership has a long history of bipartisan support (72% Of Republicans and 74% of Democrats Agree on This) The National Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO) estimates over 14 million Americans already participate in employee ownership. Shares come with votes. Expanding such programs and helping employees mobilize their votes are directions worth exploring.

Employee Ownership Offers Win/Win Benefits

All stakeholders benefit from worker ownership. Some of the benefits documented by NCEO include the following:

  • Better Corporate Performance – ESOP companies grow about 2.5 percentage points per year faster in sales, employment, and productivity
  • Higher Firm Survival Rates – Privately held ESOPs are companies half as likely to go bankrupt or close
  • Fewer Layoffs – Employee owners less likely to report being laid off in the previous year: 9.5% for all working adults compared to 1.3% for ESOPs in 2014
  • Better Employee Compensation & Benefits – Employee owners earn 5%-12% more in median wages and have 2.5x more in retirement plans than other employees
  • Strong Outcomes for Young Workers – Employee owners ages 28 to 34 enjoy 92% higher median household wealth, 33% higher income from wages, and 53% longer median job tenure
  • Address Racial and Gender Wealth Gaps – Employee owners women & workers of color enjoy many multiples of retirement assets compared to their peers

Although the above data is largely drawn from privately held companies owned through an ESOP, positive results are also found in publicly traded companies with significant employee ownership coupled with employee participation. See Shared Capitalism at Work and many more studies available at the Institute for the Study of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing

Americans are frequently told by the media that we are, on average, substantially wealthier on many measures than others in the world. Unfortunately, those reporters apparently did not study statistics. Instead of discussing wealth in America based on averages, they should focus on the typical (median) American. While measures of average American wealth benefits from Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, the typical American has less wealth than Spaniards, Italians, and many others. We should aim to decrease the gap between average and median wealth through more widespread employee ownership.

Employee Ownership and Political Efficacy

Another less measured benefit of increasing employee ownership and participation in decision-making at work is political efficacy. A couple of seminal books for me, read while on a fellowship with NIMH, were Vanek’s The Participatory Economy and Pateman’s Participation and Democratic Theory. At the time, I was tasked with the mission of trying to determine what forms of corporate governance would be best for individuals, industry, and society.

The basic message of both books is that employees who own and participate at work derive satisfaction and a sense of empowerment that not only increases the value of their enterprise but also carries into other aspects of their lives. Increased agency at work leads to an increased sense of self-worth and carries over to greater participation in all social endeavors, including politics.

Employee Ownership and Wealth Inequality

While more than 50% of Americans hold stock indirectly through retirement plans, mutual funds, ETF, etc., they typically have no say in how shares held by such vehicles are voted.  Additionally, because of poor reporting requirements, they cannot easily compare voting records for alignment with their own values. (See my petition and recent SEC proposal.)

Only 14% of families in America hold stock directly. More hold stock in one issuer (4%) than hold stock from ten issuers or more (3%). 1% own 40% of stock value; 5% own 71%, and 10% own 84%. Using slightly different measures, the Federal Reserve Board reports the following:

Stock Distribution

Wealth Inequality and Politics

Steven Pearlstein includes some interesting observations in his book, Can American Capitalism Survive?  Political polarization tracks inequality. The more inequality, the less we can get done. Considering some of the important things that hang in the balance, like a salubrious planet, political inaction is not a viable option.

Inequality - Polarization

The typical American citizen has little or no influence on policy. You generally need to be in the top 20% to get anything done. If we want capitalism and democracy to survive and thrive we need more diversity and inclusion. That will require revitalizing the workplace since that has become the source of our wealth and self-image for many.

Average citizen influence

Influence of top 20%

Employee Ownership 2022 Possible Proposals

So far, I am looking at the following types of proposals for 2022 in this area. I hope to develop these further by working with other shareholders, academics, think tanks, consultants, unions, and others. I would love to hear from and work cooperatively with readers on these and other approaches.

  1. Proxy Access – Expand to allow Employee Owners to work with other investors to place director candidates on the corporate proxy. I recently filed such a proposal at FactSet. Recent findings that directors think they are unable to monitor CEOs should help foster more cooperation between employees, directors, and shareholders. (Corporate Directors’ Implicit Theories of the Roles and Duties of Boards)
  2. Ask for a Report – Describe opportunities to encourage the inclusion of non-management employee voices in Board level decisions and how the Board intends to implement those opportunities. I recently filed such a proposal at Starbucks. This seems like a very weak proposal but perhaps it might open discussion with receptive companies.
  3. Become Social Purpose or Public Benefit Corporation – I am asking Apple to reincorporate with specific social purposes, such as benefiting the corporation’s employees or exercising care to ensure operations don’t materially degrade social or environmental systems. Can companies incorporated simply “to engage in any lawful act or activity” continue to attract dedicated employees?
  4. Disclose Ownership Data by Employee Stratum – This would be the initial phase of a long-term strategy like those aimed at addressing climate change or systematic discrimination. The SEC preparing a rulemaking on Human Capital Management. According to Chair Gensler:

    This builds on past agency work and could include a number of metrics, such as workforce turnover, skills and development training, compensation, benefits, workforce demographics including diversity, and health and safety.

    Of course, I hope to not only file proposals seeking ownership data at individual companies but to also influence the SEC to mandate such disclosures.

  5. Convert Dual-Class – Convert founder shares to shares held by an employee trust (and reduce potency). See my discussion of David Berger’s essay near the end of the first section of my recent post on Worker Voice.
  6. Broaden Compensation Committee DutiesLeo Strine and others advocate that compensation committees should have oversight responsibility for key human resources compliance areas like worker safety, Title VII, and broader issues of equity and inclusion. I would welcome opportunities to work with him and others on shareholder proposals in this area.

Employee Ownership: Related Posts

Sharing Profits is Not Enough Professor Reich

Video Friday: Wealth Inequality — Change the Rules

Corporate Governance: Opening Essay

   

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes