Guest Post

Individual Investors Drive Corporate Governance Reform Through the Proxy Process

Individual investors who file shareholder proposals have played a significant and consequential role in advancing sound corporate governance. Yet their contribution is often overlooked.

Recent debate over the shareholder proposal process has drawn strong responses from institutional investors, faith-based investors, and pension funds seeking to protect shareholders’ ability to engage companies through proposals. Missing from much of that discussion is the impact of individual investors – particularly John Chevedden and James McRitchie.

Together, Chevedden and McRitchie have filed thousands of proposals asking companies to improve their governance policies and practices. Institutional investors frequently support these reforms, regardless of whether the proposal comes from a prominent institution or an individual shareholder. Some of the practices they championed have become widely accepted; others remain contested. Not every proposed reform is necessarily right for every company, but each deserves thoughtful scrutiny and consideration.

Guest post by Timothy Smith, Senior Policy Advisor, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. research assistance by Sehr Khaliq, ICCR Director of Evaluation. Originally posted to ICCR on August 21, 2026. EDITORIAL NOTE: The source narrative says 125 proposals received more than 25% support, but the complete source tables contain 123 such entries. This version uses 123 so the prose matches the supplied data. Confirm with ICCR before changing the count. I also bolded the links and created more of them, as well as adding the big attention grabbing graphic and following song. (Both added using AI).

  • Voices in the Proxy Light
  • Persistent proponents, measurable influence

    Companies respond to individual proponents in sharply different ways. Some engage constructively and adopt full or partial reforms. Others seek to exclude their proposals through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s no-action process or through litigation.

    SEC Chair Paul Atkins recently criticized the concentration of filings by one individual. In a July 2026 speech to the Society for Corporate Governance, he noted that one person was the sole or lead proponent for approximately 41% of shareholder proposals voted on during the season. He treated that concentration, and the fact that only 8% of those proposals won majority support, as evidence that the system needs reform.

    That framing misses the larger point. A proposal need not win a majority to identify a governance weakness, attract substantial investor concern, or prompt a board to act. Support from one-quarter, one-third, or nearly one-half of votes cast is consequential. It signals that a significant portion of the company’s investors believes the board should address the issue.

    Even skeptics have acknowledged Chevedden’s influence. In a 2013 Reuters special report, James Copland of the Manhattan Institute described him as “leading the intellectual curve, getting proposals out there before they start to get traction.”

    For more background, see ICCR’s The Power of Individual Investors to Catalyze Change, McRitchie’s John Chevedden: Economy-Class Investor Advocate, and Three Shareholder Rights Advocates: Gilbert, Chevedden, McRitchie.

    What the 2026 votes show

    In 2026, Chevedden filed more than 200 shareholder proposals. Some were challenged, some did not reach a vote, and others were withdrawn following discussions with management. The data supplied for this article identify 123 proposals that received at least 25% support, including several that won majority support and one that approached 98%.

    The proposals covered familiar but important governance subjects: majority voting in director elections, equal voting rights, political-spending disclosure, shareholder rights to call special meetings or act by written consent, independent board leadership, executive equity retention, golden parachutes, and poison pills.

    These results rebut the idea that frequent individual proponents merely clutter corporate ballots with idiosyncratic demands. Large numbers of investors repeatedly supported the reforms. The proposal may originate with one person, but the vote reflects the judgment of the broader shareholder base.

    Ownership thresholds would silence useful ideas

    The SEC and corporate trade associations have debated whether shareholders should be required to own substantially more stock before submitting a proposal. Texas has gone further. Senate Bill 1057, effective September 1, 2025, permits an eligible publicly traded Texas corporation to opt into a regime under which a proponent must hold at least $1 million in voting shares or 3% of the company’s voting shares, maintain that holding for at least six months through the meeting, and solicit holders representing at least 67% of the voting power entitled to vote on the proposal.

    Those requirements would effectively exclude most individual investors. They rest on a mistaken premise: that the value of an idea depends on the wealth of the person advancing it. The history of corporate governance shows otherwise. Individual proponents have repeatedly identified reforms that later gained broad investor support and became accepted practice.

    The shareholder proposal process gives investors an orderly, nonbinding mechanism to raise issues and test support across the ownership base. Boards remain free to explain their opposition, and shareholders remain free to vote no. Silencing smaller investors before their ideas can be considered does not protect shareholder democracy; it impoverishes it.

    The 2026 voting results below demonstrate the important role individual investors play. That role should be protected, not eradicated.


    John Chevedden proposals receiving at least 25% support in 2026

    Source: Data supplied by John Chevedden and cross-checked against ICCR’s database. Vote percentages are reproduced from the source document.

    Annual Board Election (1)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Annual Board Election Fortune Brands John Chevedden 74.20%

    Annual Vote Regarding Executive Pay (1)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Annual Vote Regarding Executive Pay Meta (Facebook Inc.) John Chevedden 27.10%

    Give Each Share an Equal Vote (3)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Give Each Share an Equal Vote Ford Motor Company John Chevedden 43.10%
    Give Each Share an Equal Vote United Parcel Service (UPS) John Chevedden 40.20%
    Give Each Share an Equal Vote Lennar Corporation John Chevedden 36.70%

    Majority Vote (9)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Majority Vote BJ’s Wholesale John Chevedden 27.40%
    Majority Vote Datadog, Inc. John Chevedden 42.30%
    Majority Vote Henry Schein, Inc. John Chevedden 57.60%
    Majority Vote Calix John Chevedden 90.60%
    Majority Vote onsemi (On Semiconductor) John Chevedden 97.90%
    Majority Vote NVIDIA John Chevedden 86.00%
    Majority Vote OGE Energy Corporation John Chevedden 79.80%
    Majority Vote WEC Energy Group Inc. John Chevedden 37.30%
    Majority Vote Wells Fargo & Company John Chevedden 47.90%

    Political Contributions (7)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Political Contributions Booking Holdings John Chevedden 35.00%
    Political Contributions Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. John Chevedden 39.40%
    Political Contributions Otis Worldwide Corp. John Chevedden 39.70%
    Political Contributions Akamai Technologies, Inc. John Chevedden 45.40%
    Political Contributions Steel Dynamics, Inc. John Chevedden 39.30%
    Political Contributions O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. John Chevedden 44.20%
    Political Contributions Sonoco Products Company John Chevedden 41.50%

    Require Shareholder Approval for Excessive Golden Parachutes (2)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Require Shareholder Approval for Excessive Golden Parachutes Humana Inc. John Chevedden 41.10%
    Require Shareholder Approval for Excessive Golden Parachutes CF Industries Holdings, Inc. John Chevedden 50.90%

    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings (41)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Goldman Sachs Group Inc. John Chevedden 36.80%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings First Solar, Inc. John Chevedden 43.00%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Meritage Homes Corp. John Chevedden 25.50%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings L3Harris Technologies John Chevedden 33.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. John Chevedden 41.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings MarketAxess Holdings Inc. John Chevedden 28.40%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings PayPal John Chevedden 41.10%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings CBRE Group, Inc. John Chevedden 33.90%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Equinix, Inc. John Chevedden 30.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings HubSpot, Inc. John Chevedden 79.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Autodesk Inc. John Chevedden 47.50%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Markel Corporation John Chevedden 37.30%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings AGCO Corporation John Chevedden 48.60%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings MKS Instruments John Chevedden 32.60%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Medpace Holdings John Chevedden 34.10%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Masco Corporation John Chevedden 42.60%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Group 1 Automotive, Inc. John Chevedden 25.30%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings EPAM Systems, Inc. John Chevedden 43.40%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Timken Company John Chevedden 41.40%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Graphic Packaging Holdings John Chevedden 42.10%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Arrow Electronics John Chevedden 37.00%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Regions Financial Corporation John Chevedden 43.70%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Boston Scientific Corporation John Chevedden 42.60%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings S&P Global John Chevedden 40.80%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings AES Corporation John Chevedden 34.70%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings ICU Medical John Chevedden 40.70%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Eastman Chemical Company John Chevedden 27.80%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Equifax Inc. John Chevedden 36.30%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Entegris Inc. John Chevedden 31.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Cincinnati Financial Corp. John Chevedden 27.20%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Albemarle Corporation John Chevedden 57.50%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. John Chevedden 37.40%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Ally Financial John Chevedden 29.40%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Murphy Oil Company John Chevedden 33.90%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings NRG Energy, Inc. John Chevedden 55.50%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings NVR, Inc. John Chevedden 47.10%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Sherwin-Williams Company John Chevedden 43.30%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings TransUnion John Chevedden 72.00%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Qualcomm Inc. John Chevedden 42.10%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Keysight Technologies John Chevedden 65.00%
    Right of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Micron Technology, Inc. John Chevedden 42.90%

    Right To Act By Written Consent (31)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Right To Act By Written Consent Netflix, Inc. John Chevedden 44.40%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Caterpillar Inc. John Chevedden 39.20%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Delta Air Lines, Inc. John Chevedden 31.10%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. John Chevedden 39.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent United Airlines Holdings, Inc. John Chevedden 38.50%
    Right To Act By Written Consent AT&T Inc. John Chevedden 32.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Zoetis, Inc. John Chevedden 46.70%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Western Union Company (The) John Chevedden 27.20%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Honeywell International Inc. John Chevedden 31.90%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Assurant, Inc. John Chevedden 29.10%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated John Chevedden 57.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent ServiceNow, Inc. John Chevedden 36.50%
    Right To Act By Written Consent CBOE Holdings, Inc. John Chevedden 42.50%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Crown Holdings Inc. John Chevedden 42.60%
    Right To Act By Written Consent CMS Energy Corp. John Chevedden 36.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent The Hartford Financial Services Group John Chevedden 45.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Annaly Capital Management John Chevedden 26.60%
    Right To Act By Written Consent McDonald’s Corp. John Chevedden 41.60%
    Right To Act By Written Consent MasterCard Incorporated John Chevedden 29.70%
    Right To Act By Written Consent DT Midstream, Inc. John Chevedden 30.10%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Global Payments Inc. John Chevedden 25.80%
    Right To Act By Written Consent IBM John Chevedden 37.30%
    Right To Act By Written Consent The Boeing Company John Chevedden 39.30%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Texas Instruments Inc. John Chevedden 44.60%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Cigna John Chevedden 47.80%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Synopsys, Inc. John Chevedden 40.00%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Deere & Company John Chevedden 38.30%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Jabil Circuit, Inc. John Chevedden 38.40%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Visa Inc. John Chevedden 32.80%
    Right To Act By Written Consent CVS Health Corp John Chevedden 40.20%
    Right To Act By Written Consent Verisk Analytics, Inc. John Chevedden 52.10%

    Senior Executive Equity Retention (1)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Senior Executive Equity Retention Edison International John Chevedden 37.40%

    Separate Chair & CEO (26)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Separate Chair & CEO Marvell Technology, Inc John Chevedden 36.00%
    Separate Chair & CEO Mondelez International, Inc. John Chevedden 31.20%
    Separate Chair & CEO Morgan Stanley John Chevedden 27.30%
    Separate Chair & CEO Home Depot Foundation John Chevedden 25.90%
    Separate Chair & CEO Ecolab Inc. John Chevedden 25.90%
    Separate Chair & CEO Dover Corporation John Chevedden 35.90%
    Separate Chair & CEO CDW Corp. John Chevedden 42.60%
    Separate Chair & CEO Lincoln National Corp. John Chevedden 28.60%
    Separate Chair & CEO Dana Holding Corporation John Chevedden 27.60%
    Separate Chair & CEO J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. John Chevedden 35.10%
    Separate Chair & CEO Quest Diagnostics John Chevedden 25.50%
    Separate Chair & CEO Corpay, Inc. John Chevedden 29.90%
    Separate Chair & CEO PPG Industries, Inc. John Chevedden 32.00%
    Separate Chair & CEO AMN Healthcare Services John Chevedden 25.10%
    Separate Chair & CEO Power Integrations, Inc. John Chevedden 45.20%
    Separate Chair & CEO Gilead Sciences, Inc. John Chevedden 27.10%
    Separate Chair & CEO Prudential Financial Inc. John Chevedden 30.50%
    Separate Chair & CEO Bristol-Myers Squibb Company John Chevedden 27.40%
    Separate Chair & CEO Avery Dennison Corporation John Chevedden 39.10%
    Separate Chair & CEO FirstEnergy Corporation John Chevedden 32.80%
    Separate Chair & CEO Lockheed Martin John Chevedden 35.20%
    Separate Chair & CEO Eversource Energy John Chevedden 26.50%
    Separate Chair & CEO Colgate Palmolive John Chevedden 28.60%
    Separate Chair & CEO West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. John Chevedden 46.40%
    Separate Chair & CEO Pfizer Inc. John Chevedden 28.50%
    Separate Chair & CEO Huntsman Corporation John Chevedden 25.80%

    Shareholder Vote on Poison Pill (1)

    Resolution Company Lead filer Vote
    Shareholder Vote on Poison Pill Lumen Technologies (formerly CenturyLink) John Chevedden 47.80%

    Timothy Smith is Senior Policy Advisor at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. Research assistance for this article was provided by Sehr Khaliq, ICCR Director of Evaluation.

    Collaborate with CorpGov.net on Social Media (or Leave a Reply at the bottom)

    Linkedin
    BlueSky
    Facebook
    Mastodon
    Substack
    X (formerly Twitter)

    Posts Related to Individual Investors Drive Corporate Governance Reform

    July 2009 News Archives

    James McRitchie

    James McRitchie publishes CorpGov.Net, a popular corporate governance portal since 1995. According to the Council of Institutional Investors, McRitchie’s 2002 SEC petition "re-energized" the debate over proxy access to nominate directors. Now he filing shareholder proposals and is working on systems to further empower retail and institutional shareowners. McRitchie is frequently quoted in the press and has addressed audiences in Asia and Europe, funded by business associations, the Asian Development Bank and the U.S. State Department.

    Recent Posts

    First Agreement Reached on Broad-Based Employee Ownership Transaction Proposals

    I am pleased to report that we have reached our first agreement with a company…

    3 weeks ago

    From Executive Pay Restraint to Shared Capital: A Framework for Reforming §162(m)

    This article proposes a new federal tax architecture grounded in Shared Capital — a model…

    4 weeks ago

    Investors Mobilize to Defend Rule 14a-8

    State treasurers and investor advocates mobilize to defend Rule 14a-8, which has allowed them to…

    1 month ago

    Broad‑Based Employee Ownership Transactions

    Over the coming months, my wife and I will ask several companies to conduct Board‑supervised…

    1 month ago

    Proxy Season: Strong Performance for McRitchie

    Proxy Season: Governance Still Wins Proxy Season results for James McRitchie so far in spring…

    2 months ago

    John Chevedden’s 2026 Proposals Show How Far Some Companies Are Stretching Rule 14a-8

    Stretching Rule 14a-8. The SEC’s suspension of its decades-long Rule 14a-8 no-action process has created…

    2 months ago