Tag Archives | Declassify the Board

CorpGov.net 2025 Proxy Season Results spreadsheet

CorpGov.net 2025 Proxy Season Results

CorpGov.net 2025 Proxy Season Results exceeded our historical average, likely because we filed only 20 proposals directly. As you can see, we failed at five companies but won at fifteen, mostly by reaching agreements. “Winning” by agreement required more careful deliberation and cooperation than winning by vote. Disproportionately, those won by vote may never be […]

Continue Reading ·
Schwab 2025 - Declassify the Board

Schwab 2025: Declassify the Board

Why Hasn’t Schwab Acted on Shareholder Support to Declassify the Board? According to the Schwab 2025 opposition statement, James McRitchie’s shareholder proposal to declassify Schwab’s Board received majority support. In response, our Board introduced its own proposal  — which also gained majority support but narrowly missed the company’s unusually high 80% supermajority threshold. And then… […]

Continue Reading ·
Lantheus 2025 - Declassify the Board

Lantheus 2025: Declassify the Board

Lantheus 2025. James McRitchie’s proposal to declassify the board is one of several items on the proxy to be voted on before or during the Lantheus Holdings, Inc. annual meeting on May 1, 2025, at 6:00 a.m. Pacific time. You can attend the annual meeting in person in Bedford, Massachusetts, or online. Be sure to register […]

Continue Reading ·
Nanostring Technologies 2022

Nanostring Technologies 2022 Proxy Score 17

Nanostring Technologies 2022 annual meeting is June 17, 2022, at 9:00 am Pacific. It is a virtual-only meeting on the Broadridge platform. Of course, I (James McRitchie) recommend voting in advance, especially since many companies cut off voting as soon as proposals have been presented. To enhance corporate governance and long-term value, vote Against Dana Rollison, William D. […]

Continue Reading ·
Kellogg 2019

Kellogg 2019 Proxy Vote Recommendations

Kellogg 2019 annual meeting is April 26th. Stock price fared poorly for the last five years, so the CEO should not be paid as if he had average performance. Vote AGAINST pay. The Compensation Committee should not be reelected, since they recommended average pay for below average performance. Vote AGAINST Laschinger and Tasted. Vote AGAINST […]

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes