Tag Archives | Hain

Hain Celestial Group: How I Voted – Proxy Score 64

Hain CelestialHain Celestial Group Inc (HAIN) manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells organic and natural products in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Europe.  Hain Celestial is one of the stocks in my portfolio. Their annual meeting is on November 19, 2015. ProxyDemocracy.org had collected the votes of two funds when I checked. I also checked CalSTRS, since their votes don’t seem to be posted at ProxyDemocracy.org and I voted with the Board’s
recommendations 64% of the time. View Proxy StatementContinue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Hain Celestial Group: Win or Lose?

Hain CelestialManhattan InstituteThe Manhattan Institute‘s Proxy Monitor Project would call it another failure by a gadfly shareholder, since the Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) filed for and obtained no-action relief with the SEC, allowing it to leave my proposal for a Majority Vote standard in uncontested elections off their proxy. There is no way it can now receive a majority vote from shareowners. Therefore, the Proxy Monitor Project, SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher, Chamber of Commerce and other opponents of shareowner rights will count the proposal as a loss for shareowners and a waste of money for the corporation. Gallagher has stated his desire to have the threshold for proposals move from the current $2,000 to ‘perhaps $200,000 or even better, $2 million.’

However, a second look reveals my filing for a Majority Vote standard to be another win for both shareowners and the company. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

United Natural Foods (UNFI) & Hain Celestial (HAIN): Win or Loss?

United Natural Foods logoHain CelestialWith John Chevedden‘s help, I recently submitted shareowner proposals to United Natural Foods Inc. (UNFI) and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Both have asked the SEC for no-action letters [UNFI (UNFI no-action 8-15-2014 pdf) and HAIN] because they plan to introduce their own proposals on the same subjects. The SEC is likely to grant both requests. Shouldn’t such actions be counted as ‘gadfly’ wins by pundits like the Deal Professor? More importantly, should the SEC grant such no-action requests? Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Hain Celestial to Adopt Majority Vote Standard

HAINLast month, with the help of fellow ‘economy class investor’ John Chevedden, I submitted a proposal to Hain Celestial (HAIN) to adopt a full majority director election standard. Majority voting has become a widely prevalent practice in the S&P 500 index, with only 14% of companies failing to adopt this standard. Hain is in the S&P 600 mid-cap index where only 47% have adopted a majority vote standard. Most maintain a plurality standard. So, we were attempting to move this good governance standard downstream to mid-caps. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Hain Celestial ($HAIN): How I Voted – Proxy Score 8%

Hain Celestial Group ($HAIN) is one of the stocks in my portfolio. Their annual meeting is coming up on 11/15/2012. ProxyDemocracy.org had collected the votes of two funds when I voted on 11/8/2012.  I voted with management 8% of the time.  View Proxy Statement. Warning: Be sure to vote each item on the proxy. Any items left blank will be voted in favor of management’s recommendations. (See Don’t Let Companies Change Shareholders’ Blank Votes) Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

How I Voted at Hain, Cisco & Accuray

I waited too long to vote on the MoxyVote.com platform. However, even waiting until the day before the meeting, I was still only able to get minimal advice. I hearty thanks goes out to CalSTRS and their cooperation with ProxyDemocracy.org. At least they had announced votes for Hain and Accuray as I cast my votes this morning.

At Hain, I voted down the line with CalSTRS, withholding votes from director nominees Berke, Futterman and Meltzer, as well as voting against the long-term stock plan proposed by management. At Accuray, I would have voted with CalSTRS and management. However, the ProxyVote platform wouldn’t accept the control number provided to me by my broker. With all the proxy plumbing issues mentioned in the SEC’s concept release, I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised with this glitch. I contacted my broker. We’ll see how quickly they can resolve this.

Since not even CalPERS had announced votes at Cisco, I was on my own. I voted abstain on all the director nominees and other measures except that I voted in favor of the shareowner resolution on environmental sustainability reporting and steps to reduce possible human rights violations. Just as an experiment, I left one field blank to see if Broadridge had addressed the blank vote issue. They had not. After voting, a second page comes up asking to confirm my vote. At the top of that page, in very small print obscured by the gray background the following note appeared.  “*No vote entered.  Your vote will be cast as recommended by the soliciting committee.” And there was a small asterisk next to the vote I left blank.

Obviously, there is much work to be done to improve proxy voting. Here in voting three stocks, I was only able to obtain voting advice on two. On one of the stocks I ran into a proxy plumbing issue. I also confirmed that blank votes are still being turned over to management with only the most obscure warning. For more about that issue, see Don’t Let Companies Change Shareholders’ Blank Votes, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes