Tag Archives | (i)(9)

Shareholder Proposal Reform

Shareholder Proposal Reform Rebutted

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness (CCMC) released a paper on shareholder proposal reform, which contains a “set of recommendations for the SEC on fixing the broken Rule 14a-8 system in order to protect investors and make the public company model more attractive.” See also the Chamber’s press release, U.S. Chamber Offers Recommendations to […]

Continue Reading ·
Foiled Without Binding Proxy Access Proposals

Foiled Without Binding Proxy Access Proposals

There will be no rush to binding proxy access proposals, thanks to a July 21 denial of a no-action request filed by H&R Block. Corporations (HRB) continue with Wile E. Coyote type plots to derail genuine proxy access. See this incoming no-action request from Microsoft (MFST). However, in the case of H&R Block we foiled the […]

Continue Reading ·
Apple Shareholders Rejected Real Proxy Access

Apple Shareholders Rejected Real Proxy Access

Apple shareholders rejected real proxy access at their meeting on February 25, 2016. Maybe shareholders thought they already have it. Recent decisions by the SEC could lead shareholders to believe proxy access was “substantially implemented.” Maybe they wanted to support Apple’s management while the company is under attack from the FBI.   ISS recommended a […]

Continue Reading ·
Seal of SEC Rule 14a-8(i)(9)

“Directly Conflicts” Clarified by Staff Legal Bulletin

Never underestimate the ability of SEC staff to parse the rules in a creative way. Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14H (CF) does not adhere completely to original intent, which staff determined was “to prevent shareholders from using Rule 14a-8 to circumvent the proxy rules governing solicitations.” However, it gets us where we need to be in defining the […]

Continue Reading ·

Proxy Access: Keith Higgins Speaks on SEC’s (i)(9) Review

Yesterday (2/10/2015), Corp Fin Director Keith Higgins delivered this interesting speech entitled “Rule 14a-8: Conflicting Proposals, Conflicting Views.” There are some really interesting things in this speech on counterproposals, etc., although there isn’t much that helps those companies grappling with proxy access shareholder proposals this proxy season (but there is some, such as #6 below). […]

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes