Tag Archives | Keith Paul Bishop

John C. Coffee, Jr.

Fee-Shifting Bylaws: Race to the Bottom?

On May 8, 2014, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion in ATP Tour, Inc. v. Deutscher Tennis Bund (German Tennis Federation), No. 534, 2013 (Del. May 8, 2014), holding that fee-shifting provisions in a Delaware non-stock corporation’s bylaws are not per se invalid. (more…)

Continue Reading ·

Future Corporate Voting

Keith Paul Bishop writes: Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires companies that are subject to the SEC’s proxy rules to include in their proxy statements “a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote” to determine whether a shareholder vote on executive compensation will occur every 1, 2, or 3 years.   When the SEC was considering amendments to its rules to […]

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes