Mercer is a global consulting leader in talent, health, retirement and investments. Mercer helps clients around the world advance the health, wealth and performance of their most vital asset – their people. Mercer’s 20,000 employees are based in more than 40 countries. Continue Reading →
Tag Archives | Mercer
Mercer’s Responsible Investment Newsletter (June 15, 2010) outlines preliminary results of integrating ESG analysis into global equity portfolios.
Our analysis of the beta of ESG integration has so far been quite positive – ESG factors are material and integrating these factors into investment decision-making can reduce investment risk without sacrificing return…
Initial analysis on adding alpha to a global equity portfolio through a tilt towards sustainable themes, indicates the following:
- A portfolio with a tilt towards sustainable themes has a higher risk/reward ratio versus a broad market index, but has mixed results when versus a comparable themed index.
- In the sustainable themed space, the risk of bubbles and strategies’ short track records make manager selection key.
- The themes of renewable energy and water so far show strong return potential versus the broader market.
The Newsletter also addressed the fatalism of many investors, including large funds, who doubt their proxy vote can make a difference, providing several examples to refute that assertion. Even if you are not ready to take the plunge into “active” ownership, Mercer argues an interim step, “informed” ownership. “This could be defined simply as being satisfied, through due diligence, that votes are being cast in the best long-term interests of the end client or owner.”
Of course, Mercer offers due diligence on investment managers, including evaluation of resources and processes dedicated to proxy voting and ESG issues. They also cite membership organizations, such as the Council of Institutional Investors, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and the UN’s Principles for Responsible Investment.
Around the world, institutional investors work hard to achieve the best long-term returns for their clients, participants or beneficiaries. We believe that voting and constructive engagement with companies and peer organizations can help mitigate company specific risks for which investors may not be compensated. There is also reason to believe that more shareholder participation over time can raise the bar for corporate governance in the broader market and improve beta. If your organization agrees with these arguments, then voting and engagement may be a low cost way to help achieve these results.
A study, Investment Horizons: Do Managers Do What They Say?, conducted by Mercer and funded by the not-for-profit IRRC Institute, examines the investment horizon of active equity investment managers, comparing various strategies, different geographies and styles between June 2006 and June 2009. Nearly two-thirds of institutional investor-focused investment strategies exceeded their expected turnover from June 2006 through June 2009.
Turnover was on average 26 percent higher than anticipated, with some strategies reporting turnover between 150 and 200 percent more than expected. “Short-term investing often is cited as an issue by the press, policymakers, academics, and many in the business and investing community,” noted Jon Lukomnik, program director for the IRRC Institute. “What has not been recognized until now is that this is not only particular to day traders, arbitrage funds, or others who may have short time horizons by design. When two-thirds of long only equity institutional investment products have turnover that exceeds what they themselves expect, there is a systemic issue.”
“The findings should raise serious questions for investors,” Lukomnik continued. “When managers greatly exceed their expected turnover level, the impact can be significant in terms of cost, performance, and risk that the strategy is not being managed in line with its stated investment approach.”
“A deviation in actual versus expected turnover can be a possible indicator of deeper problems with investment processes,” said Danyelle Guyatt, the head of research for Mercer’s responsible investment team and the report co-author. “Clients interested in a strategy that seeks to capitalize on longer-term trends and hold stock in corporations for longer periods need to be aware if that situation is changing and why,” she added.
The study deployed two approaches to the data analysis. First, a quantitative analysis of portfolio turnover of over 900 strategies examined intended and realized average holding periods for various investment products across different regions and styles. Then, Mercer researchers conducted a qualitative case study analysis on eight active equity fund managers. The key findings of the quantitative analysis include:
- Nearly two-thirds of strategies have turnover higher than expected, with some strategies recording more than 150-200 percent higher turnover than anticipated. Of the 822 strategies for which Mercer had expected and actual turnover information, 550 exceeded the turnover during the sample period. The average turnover was 26 percent higher than anticipated.
- Within the entire sample of 991 strategies, the average annual turnover of the sample is 72 percent, with some 20 percent of strategies having turnover of more than 100 percent.
- Value managers tend to have a lower annual turnover figure than the other style types. Large capitalization portfolios have lower turnover rates than small capitalization strategies, and socially responsible investing (SRI) strategies have lower turnover than non-SRI strategies.
- Across regions, UK, Canadian and Australian equity strategies have the lowest average turnover value, while European (including UK), international and US strategies have the highest average turnover levels.
The key insights from the qualitative case study analysis from the fund managers include:
- Causes of short-termism  include volatile markets and changing macroeconomic conditions; mixed signals from clients; short-term incentive systems; and behavioral biases.
- Fund managers recognize the potential destructive nature of short-termism even while claiming it was unavoidable. The managers indicated that short-termism potentially places short-term pressure on companies; increases market volatility; demonstrates a lack of discipline in fund managers’ investment processes; and creates a misalignment of interests between fund managers and their clients.
- The managers also identified potential solutions to short-termism, further details of which can be found in the report. The complete study, “Investment Horizons – Do Managers Do What they Say?,” is available at http://www.irrcinstitute.org/projects.php and www.mercer.com/ri.
The report goes on to briefly examine possible regulatory measures, the idea that longer client relations with money managers and others would foster longer-term holdings, and the need to reexamine just what long-term goals and benchmarks are. We need to walk the talk. Tomorrow I will post notes from Corporate Directors 2010 where this issues was also discussed repeatedly.