Tag Archives | no-action letter

Settlement with Broadridge on Time to Vote

Settlement with Broadridge on Time to Vote

Settlement with Broadridge reached to include the language below in their proxy. I then withdrew my proposal, and they withdrew their no-action request. (SEC file) After considering issuer practices during virtual shareholder meetings and to respect the voice of our shareholders, during our annual meeting we will pause to allow time for stockholders to ask […]

Continue Reading ·
Verbal No-Action Decisions - SEC Lost Its Head

Verbal No-Action Decisions Questioned

Verbal No-Action Decisions Slammed by Shareholder Rights Group Verbal no-action decisions by the SEC threaten the integrity of corporate governance. On September 6, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a new policy providing for verbal no-action decisions that could significantly reduce transparency and accountability in the process of enforcement of the rules on shareholder proposals. […]

Continue Reading ·
AES logo

AES “Games” SEC: CII Seeks Correction

CII sent an important letter to the SEC on a recent no-action issued to the AES Corporation (AES) (not yet posted). A similar no-action had been granted in 2016 to Illumina (ILMN) on a proposal I (James McRitchie) had submitted. ISS referenced both. From the facts regarding AES, it appears John Chevedden submitted a proposal […]

Continue Reading ·
Seal of SEC Rule 14a-8(i)(9)

Rule 14a-8(i)(9) Suspended: SEC Withdraws No-Action

The SEC has essentially suspended Rule 14a-8(i)(9) Conflicts with company’s proposal. Shareowners at Whole Foods Market and at many other companies have scored a huge victory. Last Friday the SEC issued the following: Statement from Chair White Directing Staff to Review Commission Rule for Excluding Conflicting Proxy Proposals Chair Mary Jo White Jan. 16, 2015 The […]

Continue Reading ·

Preliminary No-action Lessons from 2010

DavisPolk issued a client memorandum on April 15, 2010 that just come to my attention, 2010 Proxy Season Early Trends: More Proposals, and More Exclusions. (Hat tip to Timothy Smith of Walden Asset Management). The memo notes: Last year’s Staff Legal Bulletin 14E restricted the grounds on which proposals could be excluded, which led some […]

Continue Reading ·

No-Action Letters in Question

Robert A.G. Monks submitted a couple of shareowner proposals asking for chair and CEO positions to be split. The companies appealed to the SEC and were granted no-action letters… the SEC would take no action if the companies left the proposals off their proxies. Now Monks says the SEC should get out of the business […]

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes